Legs vs leggings
Out and about in sweltering London today (23 degrees!) I spotted three different girls in denim short shorts, skimpy vests and…sweaty black leggings. What gives? If it’s hot enough for shorts (and it really was) then why spoil the effect with these party poopers? Come on girls, if you’re going to wear shorts wear them with conviction. Don’t be shy, own those legs!
13 May, 2008 @ 12:47 am
I wore leggings today!! it wasn’t that bad…honestly! My legs are just to pasty to be bared to the world! (^_^)!
Fab Sugar UK
13 May, 2008 @ 10:26 am
Agree with Rachie-Pie, my lily whites aren’t ready for the world yet
13 May, 2008 @ 10:45 am
Doh! Thanks for the explanation girls, I had no idea!
13 May, 2008 @ 11:52 am
Who wears short shorts? I wear short shorts!
13 May, 2008 @ 2:00 pm
Well my legs are whiter than snow.
I have never worn leggings in my life!
When I felt unconfortable with their state, I used to resort to loose trousers/cream jeans etc
But now I’ve realised that whoever conditioned us to think that unless you’re tanned, you should cover your legs us was so very wrong. I love the colour of my skin and will show it proudly!
If my legs are particularly scratchde (yes, scratched) I’ll wear socks. I see no excuse for leggings, ever!
13 May, 2008 @ 4:34 pm
Also i’ve got stretch marks all over my legs so leggings under shorts are a must… for me at least
13 May, 2008 @ 6:18 pm
so nice adds!
amazing time in London!
you are in my links of the day!
hope you enjoy,
Blue Floppy Hat
13 May, 2008 @ 6:32 pm
Leggings, arrrgh! They’re a scourge, I say, a scourge…(mostly).
15 May, 2008 @ 8:47 am
One word, Fathers. Live at home and try leaving the house with short shorts, light touch paper and retreat!